Comments on: Thoughts on UTF-8 over CJK charsets in Drizzle http://torum.net/2008/09/utf8-over-cjk-drizzle/ Hackaholic and a Web Addict based in Tokyo Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:03:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Jay Pipes http://torum.net/2008/09/utf8-over-cjk-drizzle/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Jay Pipes Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:02:22 +0000 http://torum.net/?p=246#comment-6 Tetsuro, that is actually what a few have suggested, and seems a very reasonable approach. Feel free to check out the drizzle-discuss mailing list thread on the topic: https://lists.launchpad.net/drizzle-discuss/msg01554.html Cheers! Jay Tetsuro, that is actually what a few have suggested, and seems a very reasonable approach. Feel free to check out the drizzle-discuss mailing list thread on the topic:

https://lists.launchpad.net/drizzle-discuss/msg01554.html

Cheers!

Jay

]]> By: Tetsuro IKEDA http://torum.net/2008/09/utf8-over-cjk-drizzle/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Tetsuro IKEDA Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:06:34 +0000 http://torum.net/?p=246#comment-5 How about making pluggable charset/collation API and implementing utf8 as built-in default charset? Pluggable one seems to be more fitting to micro kernel architecture. How about making pluggable charset/collation API and implementing utf8 as built-in default charset?

Pluggable one seems to be more fitting to micro kernel architecture.

]]> By: hyoshiok http://torum.net/2008/09/utf8-over-cjk-drizzle/comment-page-1/#comment-4 hyoshiok Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:36:16 +0000 http://torum.net/?p=246#comment-4 UTF-8 is good, local encodings are bad. I think your decision is purity reasonable. UTF-8 is good, local encodings are bad.
I think your decision is purity reasonable.

]]>